LSAT Practice Test 2025 – 400 Free Practice Questions to Pass the Exam

Question: 1 / 575

What logical inference can be made from "Sara cannot be second unless Trang is first"?

Sara is always second

Sara is never second

Trang and Sara swap positions

Sara being second depends on Trang being first

The correct answer is D because the statement "Sara cannot be second unless Trang is first" implies a conditional relationship between Sara and Trang's positions. It means that for Sara to be in the second position, Trang must be in the first position. Therefore, Sara being second is dependent on Trang being first. This logical inference is captured in answer choice D.

Regarding the other answer choices:

A. This option does not consider the conditional relationship between Sara and Trang's positions.

B. This option is too absolute and does not consider the possibility of Sara being second under certain conditions.

C. This option suggests a direct swap between Trang and Sara without considering the specific condition mentioned in the statement.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta
Next Question

Report this question

Download LSAT Practice Test PDF Study Guide
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy